nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 01, v.41 23-28
不同间伐作业方式对杉木林分生长的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 三明市林业科技项目(202042)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2024042
摘要:

通过分析不同间伐作业方式对杉木中龄林林分生长的影响,探索当前杉木人工林实际生产实践中,适宜杉木中龄林的科学抚育措施。本试验选择12年生杉木人工林为研究对象,设置了砍大留小(处理1)、砍两头留中间(处理2)、砍小留大(处理3)3种抚育间伐作业方式,以未间伐为对照处理,测定分析不同处理条件下杉木胸径、树高、蓄积量、碳储量和林分整齐度等生长指标。结果表明,间伐5 a后,在处理3条件下,杉木林分平均胸径最大,为18.69 cm,显著大于对照组和处理1(P<0.05),但与处理2的差异未达显著水平(P>0.05);在树高生长方面,处理3的平均树高最高,为16.49 m,与处理2的差异未达显著水平(P>0.05),但显著高于处理1(P<0.05);在林分蓄积量和碳储量方面,处理1显著低于处理2和处理3(P<0.05),处理2和处理3之间无显著差异;在林分整齐度方面,处理2在胸径整齐度和树高整齐度均表现最优。综上考虑,认为处理2的抚育间伐作业方式在森林经营实践过程中对林业基层生产具有指导意义。

Abstract:

By analyzing the effects of different thinning methods on the growth of a middle-aged Cunninghamia lanceolata stands, this study aims to explore the tending measures suitable for middle-aged C. lanceolata plantations in production practice. In this study, a 12-year-old C. lanceolata plantation was selected and underwent thinning in three modes: cutting the big and keeping the small(Treatment 1), cutting the big and the small and keeping the middle(Treatment 2), and cutting the small and keeping the big(Treatment 3), with non-thinning as the control. The growth indexes such as diameter at breast height(DBH), plant height, stand volume, carbon storage, and stand uniformity of C. lanceolata under different treatment conditions were measured and analyzed. The results showed that 5 years after thinning, Treatment 3 had the largest average DBH(18.69 cm), which was larger than that in the control group and Treatment 1(P<0.05) but had no significant difference from that in Treatment 2(P>0.05). The average plant height in Treatment 3 was the highest, reaching 16.49 m, which was not significantly different from that in Treatment 2(P>0.05) but higher than that in Treatment 1(P<0.05). The stand volume and carbon storage were lower in Treatment 1 than in Treatment 2 and Treatment 3(P<0.05), while neither of them showed significant difference between Treatment 2 and Treatment 3. Treatment 2 showed the best DBH uniformity and plant height uniformity. In summary, it is considered that the thinning mode of Treatment 2 has guiding significance for forest management practice.

参考文献

郭学媛,朱建华,刘华妍,等,2022.林业活动对区域森林生物量碳源汇格局的影响——以南平市为例[J].生态学报,42(23),9548-9559.

何仁亮,何昕泽,项作周,等,2021.抚育间伐对中龄杉木人工林林分生长量的影响[J].湖北林业科技,50(1),56-58.

黄晓霞,尤美子,徐伟涛,等,2022.目标树经营对杉木人工林林分空间结构的影响[J].森林与环境学报,42(2),131-140.

傅贵江,2022.杉木人工林抚育间伐对套种南方红豆杉的影响[J].武夷科学,38(1):39-43.

李晨燕,2016.首次采脂时间对马尾松林分生长与收益的影响[J].林业勘察设计,36(1),47-49,53.

刘相兵,刘亚茜,李兵兵,等,2012.生态疏伐对林分密度及直径结构的影响[J].西北林学院学报,27(3),145-149.

刘静,赵铭臻,王利艳,等等,2021.间伐保留密度和套种对杉木中龄林材种结构的影响[J].森林与环境学报,41(6):593-600.

林家富,2016.杉木人工林抚育间伐强度的规律性研究[J].安徽农学通报,22(16):84-86.

罗建芳,2022.森林抚育间伐的意义、问题及优化措施[J].新农业(8):71-72.

全国森林资源标准化技术委员会,2024.主要树种立木生物量模型与碳计量参数:GB/T 43648—2024[S].北京:中国标准出版社.

任蕾,徐端妙,吴初平,等,2019.杉木人工林目标树经营技术参数的研究[J].浙江林业科技,39(2):1-6.

沈海龙,丛健,张鹏,等,2011.开敞度调控对次生林林冠下红松径高生长量和地上生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,22(11):2781-2791.

魏阿荣,2021.抚育间伐对杉木人工林及套种楠木生长的影响[J].绿色科技,23(23):117-119.

薛卫星,陈绍林,弓瑞,等,2019.抚育间伐对森林可持续经营的影响[J].湖北林业科技,48(6):31-36,69.

涂宏涛,孙玉军,吴明钦,等,2015.杉木人工林树冠表面积及体积模型的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,35(9):88-92,103.

尹华山,2024.不同抚育间伐强度对杉木林生长的影响[J].林业勘查设计,53(1):5-8,26.

袁青,2017.采伐限额管理制度下林农生产调适行为研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学.

张焕裕,2005.作物农艺性状整齐度的研究进展[J].湖南农业科学(4):33-36.

张辉,蔡一冰,胡亚楠,等,2022.目标树经营模式对杉木人工林生长及土壤肥力的短期影响[J].西北林学院学报,37(1):191-197.

张育梅,及利,和春庭,2017.抚育间伐对云南松中幼林的影响[J].森林工程,33(1):7-11.

周玲,2014.不同地形因子对杉木树冠结构与材积的影响研究[J].安徽农学通报,20(16):83-84,94.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2024042

中图分类号:S791.27

引用信息:

[1]欧阳彩霞.不同间伐作业方式对杉木林分生长的影响[J].武夷科学,2025,41(01):23-28.DOI:10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2024042.

基金信息:

三明市林业科技项目(202042)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文