nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.42 1-10
昆虫宏条形码研究中OTU聚类阈值使用的现状和问题
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(32270499); 国家科技基础资源调查专项(2022FY100500)
邮箱(Email): huangxl@fafu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2026006
发布时间: 2026-03-30
出版时间: 2026-03-30
网络发布时间: 2026-03-30
移动端阅读
摘要:

宏条形码可以快速检测群落中的生物多样性组成,因此被广泛应用于生物多样性监测和群落生态学研究。分类操作单元(OTU)聚类阈值的选择是宏条形码分析中的关键环节,但目前尚缺乏对阈值适用性的全面评估。本研究系统综述了2015—2024年间以昆虫宏条形码为主题的338项研究,并对其OTU聚类阈值、标记基因及涉及类群等进行了统计分析。结果显示,近70%的昆虫宏条形码研究采用97%的种级相似性阈值,且该阈值并未随标记基因或分类阶元的变化而调整。当前很多宏条形码研究中OTU聚类阈值的选择普遍存在习惯化倾向,97%相似性阈值被作为默认标准在不同生物类群中广泛沿用,但该阈值源于细菌分类早期研究,并非基于对昆虫和其他真核生物类群的全面调研。鉴于不同昆虫类群及标记基因的演化速率存在差异,简单应用单一阈值容易导致物种多样性评估的偏差,从而为后续分析引入系统性偏差。为提高基于宏条形码在生物多样性监测应用中的可靠性,建议结合目标类群及基因标记特性,建立更具客观性和针对性的物种界定标准。

Abstract:

Metabarcoding enables rapid assessment of biodiversity and composition of communities and is therefore widely used in biodiversity monitoring and community-level ecological research. The selection of operational taxonomic unit(OTU) clustering thresholds is a critical step in metabarcoding analyses. However, the threshold applicability remains to be comprehensively evaluated. In this study, by systematically reviewing 338 insect metabarcoding studies published between 2015 and 2024, we analyzed the OTU clustering thresholds, genetic markers, and involved taxonomic groups. Our results showed that nearly 70% of the studies adopted a 97% sequence similarity threshold at the species level, which was rarely adjusted in response to different marker genes or taxonomic groups. It seemed that the selection of OTU clustering thresholds in many metabarcoding studies was often based on common practice, with the 97% similarity threshold being widely adopted as a default standard in various biological groups. In fact, this threshold originated from early studies on bacterial classification and was not based on comprehensive evaluation for insects and other eukaryotic groups. Given the variations in evolutionary rate among different insect groups and marker genes, simple application of a single threshold may cause over-splitting or under-merging of OTUs, thereby introducing systematic bias in subsequent analyses. To improve the reliability of biodiversity monitoring based on metabarcoding, we recommend establishing more objective and targeted species delimitation criteria by integrating the characteristics of target taxa and genetic markers.

参考文献

曹美伦,石法贤,陈亚如,等,2024.基于环境DNA宏条形码技术的南京不同林地陆生昆虫多样性差异分析初探[J].环境监控与预警,16(5):51-56.

郭艳萍,王月君,彭思嘉,等,2024.基于粪便DNA宏条形码的人工草地放牧绵羊采食组分研究[J].草地学报,32(10):3043-3051.

Aizpurua O,Budinski I,Georgiakakis P,et al,2018.Agriculture shapes the trophic niche of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe:evidence from DNA metabarcoding[J].Molecular Ecology,27(3):815-825.

Alberdi A,Aizpurua O,Gilbert M T P,et al,2018.Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,9(1):134-147.

Altermatt F,Little C J,Mächler E,et al,2020.Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks:the example of riverine systems[J].Oikos,129(5):607-618.

Antich A,Palacin C,Wangensteen O S,et al,2021.To denoise or to cluster,that is not the question:optimizing pipelines for COⅠ metabarcoding and metaphylogeography[J].BMC Bioinformatics,22(1):1-24.

Arribas P,Andújar C,Hopkins K,et al,2016.Metabarcoding and mitochondrial metagenomics of endogean arthropods to unveil the mesofauna of the soil[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,7(9):1071-1081.

Bessey C,Jarman S N,Berry O,et al,2020.Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding[J].Environmental DNA,2(4):493-504.

Bonin A,Guerrieri A,Ficetola G F,2023.Optimal sequence similarity thresholds for clustering of molecular operational taxonomic units in DNA metabarcoding studies[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,23(2):368-381.

Botnen S S,Davey M L,Halvorsen R,et al,2018.Sequence clustering threshold has little effect on the recovery of microbial community structure[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,18(5):1064-1076.

Browett S S,Curran T G,O′meara D B,et al,2021.Primer biases in the molecular assessment of diet in multiple insectivorous mammals[J].Mammalian Biology,101(3):293-304.

Butchart S H,Walpole M,Collen B,et al,2010.Global biodiversity:indicators of recent declines[J].Science,328(5982):1164-1168.

Callahan B J,Mcmurdie P J,Rosen M J,et al,2016.DADA2:high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data[J].Nature Methods,13(7):581-583.

Cardinale B J,Duffy J E,Gonzalez A,et al,2012.Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity[J].Nature,486(7401):59-67.

Clare E L,Chain F J,Littlefair J E,et al,2016.The effects of parameter choice on defining molecular operational taxonomic units and resulting ecological analyses of metabarcoding data[J].Genome,59(11):981-990.

Cline L C,Song Z,Al-Ghalith G A,et al,2017.Moving beyond de novo clustering in fungal community ecology[J].New Phytologist,216(3):629-634.

Edgar R C,2018.Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs[J].Bioinformatics,34(14):2371-2375.

Elbrecht V,Braukmann T W,Ivanova N V,et al,2019.Validation of COⅠ metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods[J].PeerJ,7(10):e7745.

Furneaux B,Anslan S,Somervuo P,et al,2025.OptimOTU:taxonomically aware OTU clustering with optimized thresholds and a bioinformatics workflow for metabarcoding data[J].arXiv.DOI:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.10350.

Hajibabaei M,Janzen D H,Burns J M,et al,2006.DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103(4):968-971.

Hanisch P E,Lavinia P D,Suarez A V,et al,2017.Mind the gap! Integrating taxonomic approaches to assess ant diversity at the southern extreme of the Atlantic Forest[J].Ecology and Evolution,7(23):10451-10466.

Hawke T,Bino G,Shackleton M E,et al,2022.Using DNA metabarcoding as a novel approach for analysis of platypus diet[J].Scientific Reports,12(1):1-10.

Hebert P D,Cywinska A,Ball S L,et al,2003.Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,270(1512):313-321.

Hopkins G W,Freckleton R P,2002.Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists:implications for conservation[J].Animal Conservation,5(3):245-249.

Huang Z,Wang Z,Liu Y,et al,2024.The links between dietary diversity and RNA virus diversity harbored by the great evening bat (Ia io)[J].Microbiome,12(1):1-19.

Kelly R P,Port J A,Yamahara K M,et al,2014.Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management[J].Science,344(6191):1455-1456.

Knebelsberger T,Landi M,Neumann H,et al,2014.A reliable DNA barcode reference library for the identification of the North European shelf fish fauna[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,14(5):1060-1071.

Lee Y,Lee W,Kanturski M,et al,2017.Cryptic diversity of the subfamily Calaphidinae(Hemiptera:Aphididae) revealed by comprehensive DNA barcoding[J].PLoS One,12(4):e0176582.

Li T C,Miao Y H,Wang T,et al,2022.Impact of mitotype diversity on metabarcoding biodiversity estimations in Insecta and Arachnida using different sample preparation strategies[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,22(8):2967-2980.

Liu M,Clarke L J,Baker S C,et al,2020.A practical guide to DNA metabarcoding for entomological ecologists[J].Ecological Entomology,45(3):373-385.

Liu Q H,Jiang L Y,Qiao G X,2013.DNA barcoding of Greenideinae(Hemiptera:Aphididae) with resolving taxonomy problems[J].Invertebrate Systematics,27(4):428-438.

Liu Y,Si M,Huang Z,et al,2023.Bats are sentinels for invasive pest surveillance based on DNA metabarcoding[J].Ecological Indicators,152:110354.

Madeira S,Duarte A,Boinas F,et al,2021.A DNA barcode reference library of Portuguese mosquitoes[J].Zoonoses and Public Health,68(8):926-936.

Mansor M S,Rozali F Z,Davies S,et al,2022.High-throughput sequencing reveals dietary segregation in Malaysian babblers[J].Current Zoology,68(4):381-389.

Marquina D,Esparza-Salas R,Roslin T,et al,2019.Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding:surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,19(6):1516-1530.

McClenaghan B,Nol E,Kerr K C,2019.DNA metabarcoding reveals the broad and flexible diet of a declining aerial insectivore[J].The Auk,136(1):1-11.

Melcher A C,Weber S,Birkhofer K,et al,2024.To pool or not to pool:pooled metabarcoding does not affect estimates of prey diversity in spider gut content analysis[J].Ecological Entomology,49(6):768-778.

Miya M,2022.Environmental DNA metabarcoding:a novel method for biodiversity monitoring of marine fish communities[J].Annual Review of Marine Science,14:161-185.

Morinière J,Hendrich L,Balke M,et al,2017.A DNA barcode library for Germany′s mayflies,stoneflies and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera,Plecoptera and Trichoptera)[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,17(6):1293-1307.

Nell C S,Pratt R,Burger J,et al,2023.Consequences of arthropod community structure for an at-risk insectivorous bird[J].PLoS One,18(2):e0281081.

Pappalardo P,Hemmi J M,Machida R J,et al,2025.Taxon-specific BLAST percent identity thresholds for identification of unknown sequences using metabarcoding[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,16(10):2380-2394.

Pereira A,Xavier R,Perera A,et al,2019.DNA metabarcoding to assess diet partitioning and feeding strategies in generalist vertebrate predators:a case study on three syntopic lacertid lizards from Morocco[J].Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,127(4):800-809.

Rakotonirina T J,Viljoen E,Rakotonirina A H,et al,2023.A DNA barcode reference library for CITES listed Malagasy Dalbergia species[J].Ecology and Evolution,13(3):e9887.

Sander M,Beermann A J,Buchner D,et al,2024.Environmental DNA time series analysis of a temperate stream reveals distinct seasonal community and functional shifts[J].River Research and Applications,40(5):850-862.

Saqib H S A,Sun L,Pozsgai G,et al,2022.DNA metabarcoding of gut contents reveals key habitat and seasonal drivers of trophic networks involving generalist predators in agricultural landscapes[J].Pest Management Science,78(12):5390-5401.

Somervuo P,Yu D W,Xu C C,et al,2017.Quantifying uncertainty of taxonomic placement in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,8(4):398-407.

Stackebrandt E,Goebel B M,1994.Taxonomic note:a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology[J].International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology,44(4):846-849.

Tedersoo L,Bahram M,Zinger L,et al,2022.Best practices in metabarcoding of fungi:from experimental design to results[J].Molecular Ecology,31(10):2769-2795.

Thomsen P F,Willerslev E,2015.Environmental DNA:an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity[J].Biological Conservation,183:4-18.

Uchida N,Kubota K,Aita S,et al,2020.Aquatic insect community structure revealed by eDNA metabarcoding derives indices for environmental assessment[J].PeerJ,8(6):e9176.

Zeale M R,Butlin R K,Barker G L,et al,2011.Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces[J].Molecular Ecology Resources,11(2):236-244.

Zhang L,Liu Z,Sun K,et al,2024.Multi-dimensional niche differentiation of two sympatric breeding secondary cave-nesting birds in Northeast China using DNA metabarcoding[J].Ecology and Evolution,14(7):e11709.

Zhang X,Wang W,Yu X,et al,2022.Biological composition analysis of a natural medicine,Faeces Vespertilionis,with complex sources using DNA metabarcoding[J].Scientific Reports,12(1):1-9.

Zhu D,Liu Y,Gong L,et al,2024.The consumption and diversity variation responses of agricultural pests and their dietary niche differentiation in insectivorous bats[J].Animals,14(5):815.

Zhu X C,Chen J,Chen R,et al,2017.DNA barcoding and species delimitation of Chaitophorinae(Hemiptera,Aphididae)[J].ZooKeys,656(656):25-50.

Zinger L,Bonin A,Alsos I G,et al,2019.DNA metabarcoding:need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions[J].Molecular Ecology,28(8):1857-1862.

Zizka V M,Leese F,Peinert B,et al,2019.DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method[J].Genome,62(3):122-136.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2026006

中图分类号:Q969

引用信息:

[1]辛佳朔,彭欣,张健,等.昆虫宏条形码研究中OTU聚类阈值使用的现状和问题[J].武夷科学,2026,42(01):1-10.DOI:10.15914/j.cnki.wykx.2026006.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金(32270499); 国家科技基础资源调查专项(2022FY100500)

发布时间:

2026-03-30

出版时间:

2026-03-30

网络发布时间:

2026-03-30

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文